[À COMPLÉTER] Revue de presse "juez" : faits manquants

This entry is a blocking flag, not a publishable article. The automated request asked for a Spanish-press review built around the "juez" angle, but the "Verified facts" block and the "Distinct sources available" list both reached the newsroom empty. With no sourced who, what, where, when or how much to work from, there is no factual base to answer first, and no two outlets to compare, which is the whole point of a press-review format.

Per the sources charter (version 3), which overrides every other rule, we invent no fact, figure, date or name beyond what is provided, and here nothing was provided. Producing a plausible-looking story anyway would breach that rule outright. So this draft deliberately reports the input failure instead of guessing at a court ruling or judicial decision.

To unblock: re-run the pipeline for the "juez" angle with a populated fact set (each fact dated and tied to a named Spanish outlet) and a real source list. Once those arrive, the review can be written directly in English, juxtaposing what each outlet reports. Until then, this stays a draft for human review and must not go live.

Sources : Google Trends.